This is an inside story of one man’s unfortunate experience at the hands of the (British) General Medical Council. it was the misfortune of Mr Shankar Kashyap, eminent consultant surgeon, to become the victim of the GMC’s own disciplinary processes.
With extensive use of the transcripts of the various hearings Mr Kashyap takes us from the point where life is good for him and his family. He has become an acknowledged expert in his particular specialism of hip replacements. He works hard and productively, bringing new efficiencies to his hospital and is in demand worldwide for lectures and demonstrations. His family are happy and settled.
The initial notice of complaint against him was a shock, but nothing happened for two years. Thereafter things rapidly deteriorate as he and his team of advisors battle to deal with the allegations against him. In a ridiculously long drawn out and expensive process it appears that the various assessors and panellists assigned to his case have prejudged his guilt. The charges are patently trumped up and minor but those in charge of Mr Kashyap’s destiny seem determined to ignore the mounting evidence in his favour. Meanwhile his career and life generally nosedive and he becomes understandably depressed. It takes, astonishingly, six years to determine the case and I won’t spoil the ending.
This is a fascinating read, even for someone who dropped Biology like a stone at the earliest opportunity at school. For medical practitioners and students it will shock and astonish. Although it is maybe overlong the author has a flowing and engaging style that draws one along relentlessly.
One big minus point though. I’m afraid there is little evidence of proof-reading after the half-way point. The text is dripping with poor punctuation, typos, misuse of capitalisation and mis-spelling. I would recommend that the Kindle edition is thoroughly overhauled in this regard, as well as any future print edition if applicable.
But in summary the author exacts his revenge with words as sharp and clinical as his instruments and I wish him every future success in both his chosen career and his writing.
The typos would bug me too but the book sounds like a fascinating read. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
Thank you Jenny! That review was primarily for another blogging review site so I was honour bound to point out the shortcomings. Although it’s a criticism hopefully it’s a constructive one.
There is still the odd small error in each of my books and each one is an arrow through my heart 🙂
LikeLike
This sounds highly intriguing, Roy. As you know I’m interested in these kinds of debacles after what happened to me with the Tax Office!
Hopefully Shankar will read your review and have someone proof his story because it sounds like a really worthwhile read 😀
LikeLike
It’s desperate stuff Dianne. It seems innocent people are being treated as collateral damage for any organisation determined to ‘make a statement’. Fortunately you and Shankar are made of sterner stuff.
LikeLike
Thank you Roy for an excellent review. Typos and grammatical errors are not good in any read!! Thanks for pointing them out to me. I’ll get an editor to go through the book and get it re-published. Thanks again for an excellent effort. Much appreciated.
LikeLike
Hi Shankar. It was my pleasure to be associated with you in this small way. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. Every best wish.
LikeLike